@l3technologycambodia wrote:
Does anyone have experience to make more powerful radio for Reach RS+? I heard RFD 900+ radio could be an option? Does anyone here have a successful integration of this radio with Reach RS+?
We are having issues in keeping stable fixes with LoRa connections, particularly in the city where the LoRA will work less than 1km baseline.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@michael.asgian wrote:
I’m looking for recommendations for rod to mount the Reach RS on that will stay in place (tripod maybe) vertical until I get a fix at the point and also will give me a way to measure the RS height from the ground. Is there something like that?
Posts: 3
Participants: 3
@norcal_dean wrote:
After updating to Reachview V2.14.0 I am unable to receive CRTN (California Real Time Network) corrections from local base station. The base position shows up on the “status” page, but no RTK parameters are available and no gray bars appear in the satellite chart. Correction input page shows I am connected to the site. I’ve tried a couple different sites with no luck.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@amclemore wrote:
I am unable to reflash my Reach RS+. I have followed the guide several time on multiple computers (all running Windows 10) but keep getting the same error. The error I receive is Error 5: Access is denied. See the image.
ReachRSp%20flash%20error|428x500
I have only used the Reach RS+ a few times.
Anyone have experience with this error?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@timd1971 wrote:
Thought this was a interesting video of the Emlid guys!
What is this AQS-R?
Such great quality, design, company and community.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@kst6627 wrote:
Hello every one.
I would like to know standard height data source of Reach RS.
what is Zero point source of height? LLW? HHW? or other els.Please let me know about it.
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@dmitriy.ershov wrote:
Hello everyone,
This year Emlid is shortlisted for Wichmann Innovations Award in Hardware category and we are pretty excited about it!
About the Award
The Wichmann Innovations Award is presented by publisher Wichmann Verlag. From a variety of companies submitting their products, only 5 are selected for the final voting in each category. The main criteria for the awards are “innovation”, “user-friendliness” and “practicality”.
The best software/hardware of the year will be announced during Intergeo 2018. You can now vote for Reach RS+ on this page until October 17:https://gispoint.de/wia/2018/voting.html
With your support, we can make this happen!
Posts: 2
Participants: 1
@paul.ebbenga wrote:
After going through a few of the configuration steps in Q Ground Control this error popped up and continues to pop up. I am running Navio2 on RPI3.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@Julien_DroneAlsace wrote:
We recently acquired a Reach RS + antenna to measure GCPs for drone mapping projects. We are testing this solution with a national NTRIP provider (Orpheon / France) to achieve centimeter accuracy.
This week, to verify the good functioning, I measured known points that we had collected 6 months earlier for an old modeling project (using a Leica antenna connected to the same NTRIP network).
The precision obtained in XY is centimeter, there is a difference in average measurements less than one centimeter.
However, the elevation data show a difference of about 47m.GCP1 LEICA 7.75957778 48.58578098 141.277
GCP2 LEICA 7.76043817 48.58616646 140.823GCP1 REACH 7.75957757418 48.5857807328 188.977142009
GCP2 REACH 7.76027878753 48.5860843939 188.598433953Can someone explain to me how this gap is possible? Knowing that the elevation data from the previous survey are correct.
Thanks in advance for your answers,
Julien
Posts: 6
Participants: 3
@Barry_Bolton wrote:
Hello and thank you for reading.
After upgrading qgroundcontrol to 3.4 I have parameters that are not loading properly.
Any ideas?
Posts: 2
Participants: 1
@bbn_milan wrote:
I have wanted take a point but the rover don’t find any solution, despite to get a fine signal how show the photos, include the zone where is being used there are electric tower and sometime cloudy
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@kwatkins wrote:
Hi, I have a rover I’m trying to get spinning and running and coming into issues related to being
clueless when it comes to hardware,TLDR; The rover is only going forward, with both engines spinning in the same direction.
I’m unable to get this “steer” mode I keep reading about working. The servo’s are plugged into the Navio2+ controller, channels 1 and 2. (Screenshot1) and I’m using a Sabertooth2x12 (ESC) to control two brushed motors with all dipswitches set to up (Screenshot2)
I’m able to connect and get everything else looking good w/ MissionPlanner.It seems only the left and right (forward and backward) are doing anything, almost like only one channel is working? Screenshots attached.
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@Barry_Bolton wrote:
Was flying in loiter mode today practicing circling when once again, as in all the other crashes I had with Navio 2 the motors just stopped.
I have attached photos so that you can see the damage to my equipment.You will see from the marks on the propellers that there was no propeller movement at the time of impact.
This is the last crash I am willing to tolerate and would like to know how I need to RTS these 2 units to emlid
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@nitirohilla1489 wrote:
Hi,
I want to use Reach M+ with RTK. But I have few queries regarding the same.
- When Reach M+ is used with RTK then will it change the message format that it will output or will send the NMEA messages containing its position?
- When used with RTK, will Reach M+ output its relative position or absolute position. If I want to get the absolute position then do I need to change its configuration?
- How will reach M+ send the covariance data… via GST messages ?
Request your support.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@tobias-dahms wrote:
Bug in survey: I’m missing “collection start” and “collection end” values in the csv export.
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@dmitriy.ershov wrote:
Rough vibrations, typical for machinery, can affect RTK performance bringing down the quality of machinery guidance and auto-steering. That’s why we created Vibration Damping Platform for Reach RS/RS+, meant to reduce vibrations transferred to the receiver.
We have conducted a series of tests where a pair of Reach RS was installed on tractors. One Reach RS was installed rigidly, another – using the Vibration Damping Platform. The fixed solution for Reach RS with vibration damping platform was holding 96.1% of the time versus 61% for Reach RS mounted without damping.Tests show that a vibration damping platform for Reach RS/RS+ helps to reduce an impact of severe shocks drastically increasing fix time.
As you can see from the graphs below, the acceleration for all 3 axes is reduced, as well as the solution is more robust and accurate – fix rate is significantly higher.
Solution dropout caused by a heavy bump that can be noticed on the left graphs evaporates on the right, thanks to damping platform.
Vibration Damping Platform is now available for order in Emlid Online Store. Don’t hesitate to reach out to us if you have any question about using the platform on your machinery.
Posts: 2
Participants: 1
@dpitman wrote:
Hi Guys,
From the docs, I paired my phone (Google Pixel on Android 8) to the Reach module (on 2.14.0) and changed the output to Bluetooth/NMEA.
Tried using 2 different apps, Bluetooth GPS and Mapit, to check and neither receives any data.
Mock GPS in the phone is setup fine and I can input data from a Garmin Glo without issue.What do I have wrong, please?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@christoph2010 wrote:
Hello everybody!
I´ve got big problems with the WiFi-connection at my Reach RS+.
Very often I am not able to connect to an other Known-WiFi and I don´t know why. I have got 2 different WiFis (Signal is very strong). If I want to change between the wifis my Reach mostly goes into the hotspot-mode and I have no idea why.
Sometimes Reach starts in hotspotmode in case of one of the known wifi is available.
Could it be that Reach does not wait enough long to get a response from the router?
Is there a priority for the reach wich known wifi it connects?A few days ago I thought it could case on my iPhone SE I use. But the problem also exists if I want to connect with my computer.
I seems that it doesn´t depend on the ReachView version. I had the same problems with 2.14. Knwo I use 2.15.2-dev (Stack out-mode is very great! Great job!) and it´s the same.
Does anyone has any idea?
Thx, Christoph
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@darrylbarrow wrote:
Has anyone compiled and got version 2.4.3 b28 convbin & rnx2rtkp to work yet?
Thanks
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@Akay_Yesiloz wrote:
Hi All
İ want to use rtk witk reach rs and edge for tractor guidance. But not working rs with edge. i tried every way and not comminicate any way.
usb to pc output select reach rs not working navio2 and emlid (im write dev/ttyUSB vs vs vs)
reach rs db9 cable directly connect rx/tx cable from edge ser1 and ser 2 not connect
reach rs db9f cable connect with rs232 to ttl edge bot connect
reach rs usb to ttl not working edge
wifi tried navio2 not connect to rs
im tried erb and NMEAHow do I connect rs to edge
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
